Posts tagged ‘4 stars’

May 13, 2012

Book Review: #27 – Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict by Laurie Viera Rigler (audio)

Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict by Laurie Viera Rigler

Narrators: Orlagh Cassidy
Source
: Sacramento Library
Finished: 5/1/12
Rating: 4 out of 10
Publisher: Penguin Audiobooks
Length: 7 hours, 19 minutes
Pages: 304 (print version)
Published: 2007
Challenges: 2012 Audio Book Challenge2012 TBR Pile Reading Challenge

Synopsis (from Booklist): One moment Courtney Stone is a modern-day L.A. career woman lamenting a lost love; the next she is Jane Mansfield, a well-to-do, willowy lady in nineteenth-century England. What could account for this transplant of time and place? Courtney has no opportunity to ruminate over such matters; she must quickly learn to interact with inhabitants of the brave old world in which she finds herself. It’s not long before Jane finds the lines blurred between her two vastly different selves.

Overall Impression: Might I just say I really dislike writing negative reviews? I feel bad. I’m sure the author is a lovely person. But here it goes anyway:

Perhaps this should have been called All the Jane Austen AND All the LA Girl Cliches Ever. I picked up a copy somewhere and it’s been sitting on my shelf for ages. In an effort to get through more of my TBR pile, I’ve been grabbing books of the library audio book shelf, since I don’t seem to have as much read-an-actual-book time as I used to. I was hoping for a little light escapism (I’ve been reading a lot of heavier stuff lately) — but it really just turned out to be so trite. Courtney was not very likable as a heroine — she complains, she doesn’t have much self-worth, she is kind of a self-centered ditz (where is my vodka and lipstick?), and although she claimed to be an Austen addict, she really is clueless when it comes to how she should speak and act. The men in the book were all cliches as well — the misunderstood brooding hero, the rake who tries to compromise her virtue. I also felt like the author was lazy and didn’t come up with a credible reason why Courtney found herself in Austen’s time. A fortuneteller tells her time is fluid? There’s a connection? Not enough to make this time travel plausible for me.

Positives: The writing was actually pretty good, and there were a few laugh-out-loud funny moments.

Negatives: Plot and characterization.

Narration: Cassidy is actually a fantastic narrator — she nails both the female and male American and British accents with no problem. Part of me wonders if I might have rated it even lower had I read it instead of listened to it. *cringe*

Other books I’ve read by Laurie Viera Rigler: none

Other books I’ve listened to narrated by Orlagh Cassidy: The Postmistress by Sarah Blake (review)

Other blogger opinions:

Dear Author: “I enjoyed watching Courtney grow as a person and delighted in her finally finding her own ‘Mr Darcy.’”

Iris on Books: “I often come to these books prepared to be disappointed and that was wholly unnecessary in this case.”

The Sleepless Reader: “What can I say? Not exactly my cup of tea? Gritting my teeth to powder?”

April 21, 2012

Book Review: #23 – The Botany of Desire by Michael Pollan (audio)

The Botany of Desire by Michael Pollan

Narrator: Scott Brick
Source
: Audible
Finished: 4/14/12
Rating: 4 out of 10
Publisher: Audio Evolution
Length: 8 hours, 54 minutes
Pages: 271 (print version)
Published: 2001
Challenges: 2012 Audio Book Challenge

Synopsis (from the Book Description): In The Botany of Desire, Michael Pollan ingeniously demonstrates how people and domesticated plants have formed a similarly reciprocal relationship. He masterfully links four fundamental human desires—sweetness, beauty, intoxication, and control—with the plants that satisfy them: the apple, the tulip, marijuana, and the potato. In telling the stories of four familiar species, Pollan illustrates how the plants have evolved to satisfy humankind’s most basic yearnings.

Overall Impression: I think it’s interesting that a lot of the reviews I read said that Pollan didn’t really push too hard — but all I could think as I was listening was “agenda! agenda! agenda!” And thought it’s an agenda that I agree with, for the most part, I still thought The Botany of Desire was way too preachy. I think this might be, in part, to the narration. It was a combination of preachy plus pretentious narration that did this book in for me. There was something about the writing (and narration) that made it seem like Pollan thought he was better than everyone else and that he had this secret knowledge and we were just so darn lucky to be able to hear it, and now that we’ve heard it we can’t help but agree with everything.

Were the chapters interesting? Yes and no. Some of the stories and facts were very interesting — Johnny Appleseed, Tulipmania, the Irish Potato Famine. I guess I enjoyed the history. But when it came to the science, the botany, and the agenda behind them — I found myself bored and rolling my eyes and wishing the book was over. Also, somehow everything became sexy, even though I didn’t think it was needed — Dionysus and bacchanalia and all that. Meh.

Which is too bad — I really liked Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma and downright loved In Defense of Food. Perhaps this was just a miss for me from an author that usually connects.

Positives: Some interesting historical content and theories about how people and plants have co-evolved.

Negatives: Pretentious agenda. Is that a thing?

Narration: I’ve liked Scott Brick in the past, but this was far too exaggerated and sanctimonious for me.

Other books I’ve read by Michael Pollan: The Omnivore’s Dilemma (review), In Defense of Food (no review)

Other books I’ve listened to narrated by Scott Brick: The Invisible Man (review)

Other blogger opinions:

Adventures in Reading: “ One of the perfections of Pollan’s book is that he is not necessarily trying to prove anything.”

The Dogear Diary: “Not terribly scientific, but for someone like me who doesn’t know much about the natural history of plants, quite readable and very interesting.”

Devourer of Books: “He is also fantastic at showing the impact of plants, food, and the topics surrounding them on the lives of normal people, without getting ‘preachy.’”

August 5, 2011

Book Review: #64 – The Red Garden by Alice Hoffman

 

Note: I still have a few reviews from July to churn out before I get to my Read My Own Books Month reviews. Enjoy!

The Red Garden by Alice Hoffman

Narrator: Nancy Travis
Read
: For my Five Women and a Baby book club
Source: Sacramento Library
Finished: 7/29/11
Rating: 4 out of 10
Publisher: Random House Audio
Pages: 304 (print version)
Published: 2011

Synopsis (From Bookmarks Magazine): According to the critics, The Red Garden is among Alice Hoffman’s recent best. She can occasionally be melodramatic, her stories overrun by fairy tale syntax. Although the magical abounds here—women become eels—there is little, if anything, that is overdone. Not every story is wholly believable, but “Hoffman’s consciously simple style transforms people’s pain into mythic parable” (Washington Post), so that the mythic then becomes lore. Only the Boston Globe cited the collection as somewhat uneven, with the best stories (including “The Red Garden”) absolutely bewitching and the lesser ones simplistic and implausible. But that is to be expected from an author with her own peculiar, enchanting brand of magical realism.

Overall Impression: My low rating of this book probably stems from having just read Jhumpa Lahiri’s beautiful and haunting short stories. The Red Garden is also broken into stories, connected through a town’s lineage with characters appearing at different ages in different stories. For some reason, I could not connect with this book at all. While her writing style was appealing and easy to listen to, the plot and characters felt distant and a little forced. I had a hard time wrapping my brain around some of the connections in the stories, and spent too much time pondering, for example, who Kate was and where she appeared in previous stories. This being an audio book, I couldn’t flip backward and find out, and I ended up missing bits and pieces of the story I was currently listening to. I found that frustrating, but I don’t think it would have been such a problem with the print version of the book.

One thing I really look for in short stories is humanity. I want the author to delve into people and find out what makes them them. For the most part, this felt like I was just listening to people grow up, without ever finding out what made them human. There were some stories that accomplished this better than others (I liked the story about the “monster” of Blackwell), but for the most part I was disappointed. It’s not good when you’re longing for a book to end so you can move onto something else.

Positives: Hoffman does have a beautiful writing style…

Negatives: …but it never pierced the hearts and motivations of her characters.

Narration: Nancy Travis did a fine job, although numerous viewings of So I Married an Axe Murderer have made it nearly impossible for me to hear her as anyone but Mike Myer’s potentially murderous girlfriend. (Woman! Woah, man. Woaaaaah man!)

Other books I’ve read by Alice Hoffman: Practical Magic

Other blogger opinions:

Literally Booked: “Overall, I would highly recommend this novel for its elegant blending of reality and magic, and Hoffman’s talent at portraying characters from various periods in a manner that is faithful to the social norms of their time.”

The Book Worm’s Library: “The characters move on and off stage, and gives us just a small glimpse of how this small little town came to be, grew into what it was, and continues to develop as time moves on.”

Literary Corner Cafe: “In general, I dislike magical realism, but I love the brand of magical realism written by Alice Hoffman.”

Red Room Library: “Hoffman is a great storyteller, and her language rolls off the page, but she does not penetrate the essence of human existence.”

February 8, 2011

Book Review #8 – Naomi and Ely’s No Kiss List by Rachel Cohn and David Levithan

Naomi and Ely’s No Kiss List by Rachel Cohn and David Levithan

Read: For the Literary Goddesses book club
Source
: Sacramento Library
Finished: 1/26/11
Rating: 4 out of 10
Publisher: Knopf
Pages: 256
Originally Published: 2008

Synopsis: NYU freshmen Naomi and Ely have been BFF’s since the cradle. Their friendship has even survived an affair between Naomi’s dad and one of Ely’s moms. But all that changes when Ely impetuously kisses Bruce, Naomi’s boyfriend. When Bruce decides he wants to be with Ely, Naomi is forced to confront the romantic feelings she’s always had for her best friend, despite their shared preference for boys. Naomi’s chapters are littered with icons that are more distracting than engaging, but teens will be be burning the CD playlists swapped between characters even before the book ends.

Overall Impression: Some friends and I have joined together to create an online book club, dubbed Goddesses of All Things Literary. This is the first book I read as a part of the book club, and to be honest, I only finished it because I was really enjoying the process of discussing the book in blog format. Other than that I pretty much hated the characters. All of them. Very few redeeming qualities, even at the end. The writing was good in parts, overwraught and trying-to-hard in others. My thoughts are more clearly spelled out here, in our book club discussions:

Chapters 1 – 6
Chapters 7 – 12
Chapters 13 – 18
Chapters 19 – end

Positives: A few gems — “There’s no such thing as a soulmate…and who would want there to be? I don’t want half of a shared soul. I want my own damn soul.”

Negatives: I seriously hated every selfish person in this book. Which was everyone.

Other books I’ve read by Rachel Cohn or David Levithan: none

Other blogger opinions:

Jen (As Told By Jen): “I found myself faced with a dilemma – I couldn’t stand Naomi and Ely, but I really liked a couple of the other characters, and I liked the writing style.” 

Kelly (KellyVision): “…but was just not thrilled with this one…The last chapter of this book completely saved it, though.  It was sweet and smart and funny.”

RaiderGirl (An Adventure in Reading): “In fact, it took a while to get past the hip, snarky conversations between Naomi and Ely, but eventually, I really liked the book and the lessons learned by our main characters.”

December 13, 2010

#80 – The Emperor of Ocean Park by Stephen L. Carter

The Emperor of Ocean Park by Stephen L. Carter

Read: based on a recommendation of my friend Noelle (Knopf, 672 pages, originally published June 2002)

Rating: 4 out of 10 (finished 11/25/10)

Synopsis: A complex, smart mystery filled with intrigue, drama, and more than a little danger awaits in Stephen L. Carter’s engaging debut novel, The Emperor of Ocean Park. After the funeral of his powerful father (a federal judge whose nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court became a public scandal), Talcott Garland, an African American law professor at an Ivy League university, is left to unravel the meaning of a cryptic note and carry out “the arrangements” his father left behind. Armed with fortitude and familial devotion–though paranoid of his wife’s fidelity–Talcott soon finds himself in an investigation that entangles him with a number of questionable Washington, D.C., denizens, including attorneys and government officials, law professors, the FBI, shady underworld figures, chess masters, and friends and family. All the while Talcott tries not to hurt his attorney wife’s chance for a judicial nomination–and their fragile marriage–but the closer he comes to unraveling his father’s dark secrets, the more dangerous things become.

Overall Impression: This book was too long. 672 pages for a legal thriller? Come on. It could have been cut and parsed down to a good 400 pages and been a much better book. Instead, it felt like a slog. I picked up the book while visiting my friend Noelle during the 4th of July weekend. I finished it at the end of November. That ain’t right. I never sucked me in like a good book should.

I liked the mystery in and of itself. I thought it was intriguing and I really wanted Garland to figure out what “the arrangements” were, and how they were connected to his deceased father. I thought the mix of characters was interesting, though a lot of them fell flat for me (evil “uncle,” saucy mystery woman, rogue FBI agent, etc.). The story sort of plodded along, and the “action” wasn’t all that “actiony.” The racial relations were sort of fascinating, but by the end I felt like saying, “Dude. Get over it and get on with your life.” (Granted, I am a white woman, so I’m not sure I can really have much of an opinion here). Then it got to the end and I wasn’t all that excited for what happened. Overall, the whole book just didn’t do it for me.

Pros: Good plot. I liked his writing style, but it could have used some judicious editing.

Cons: Not gonna lie — I was bored.

Other blogger opinions:

The Book Marque: “Talcott wanted to solve the mystery, but it was almost against his will that he did and the slow pace of the story brought that out even more than Talcott’s constant justification.”

Jstef: “I loved how he hid the plot points from me to build up the excitement without leaving me frustrated.”

Other books I’ve read by Stephen L. Carter: none

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 784 other followers