Posts tagged ‘book’

April 4, 2011

30 Days of Books – Day 10

This is a 30 Days of Books entry.

A Favorite Classic Book

A Room with a View by EM Forster

What is it about this slim little novel that I loved so much? It’s simplicity, for one. I love Forster’s writing and how he can convey that sense of complete and utter emotional turmoil underneath a placid British exterior. It’s also humorous and lovely, and makes me want to go to Italy (which I am doing next month so…yay!). The book is just so…yummy. The movie version of A Room with a View might be my favorite movie adaptation of all time — check that out as well.

Here are a few other peeps who are participating in the 30 Days of Books challenge, too. (Let me know if you’re in; I’ll add you here!)

Steve Betz
Bookishly Fabulous
Madtante

KellySouth
Rossruns

March 31, 2011

The Librarian’s Boxes

My friend Cathy was over for Bunco the other day at my house, and afterward she asked to see my personal library. Show someone my books? Okay!

She spent some time looking over my shelves and gave me just about the best compliment I’ve ever received as a reader: “No wonder I couldn’t gauge you as a reader. You don’t fit in any of my librarian boxes.”

Not sure why I loved that compliment so much, but it’s true — I read across the board. I don’t stick to one genre. Heck, I don’t stick to a dozen genres. I’d rather take the recommendations of people I trust, no matter the genre.

There are also certain factors that I base my reading on, rather than genre. The quirk factor – is it weird? Would it be hard to describe to someone? The dark factor – is it a little twisted? Is something about it just not quite right? The beauty factor – does something in it exist on a higher plane? Do I recognize a glimpse of the divine in it? The originality factor – is it something unexpected and new? Does it make me want to talk about it? The educational factor – have I learned something I never would have before? And the writing factor – above all, I love writers who can put together words in a way that stops my breath because it’s perfect.

Note that plot is secondary. Great plot — awesome, but it can be ruined quickly by bad writing or flat characters. I’d rather read a well-written book that’s more of a character study than anything, rather than a book that races along but falls flat and lacks depth.

Cathy did end up giving me several recommendations based on what she saw in my library. My to-read list is an ever-growing monster. It’s going to eat me alive one of these days.

What about you? Do you read specifically from a few genres? Could a librarian put you in a box? Or is there something you like that supercedes genre alone?

Tags:
December 19, 2008

“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can’t read them.” Mark Twain

I feel like I write book updates all the time, but somehow I find I've gone a month and a half and all of a sudden I have too many books to talk about. Anyway, here are some short and some long reviews!

When You Are Engulfed In Flames by David Sedaris: The newest book of essays by Sedaris isn't quite as funny as I have found his other books to be. It's darker. It's kind of gross in some places. It wasn't laugh-out-loud funny. I spent the whole book vaguely uncomfortable. The bit about quitting smoking was the best. Rating: 5 out of 10. A big solid "meh."

Persuading Annie by Melissa Nathan: I really like Nathan's books. They are all the things I like about the "chick lit" (still hate that term) genre, and nothing that I don't — and this one was no exception. Delightful! I only have one book of hers left. A few years ago she died of cancer, which is really quite sad. I love to read what else she might have written. Rating: 9 out of 10, partly because I liked it so much, partly because I wish we could have been friends.

Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert: A summary — French people acting painfully selfishly. I thought it was really well-written, but I had no one to root for. I can definitely understand why the book was so incredibly scandalous, and a lot of it is extremely applicable to today. Rating: 6 out of 10, for being an education in desire, selfishness, lies, and one's ultimate undoing.

The Faith Club by Ranya Idliby, Suzanne Oliver, and Priscilla Warner: Three women embark on a journey to find out what unites them about their three faiths — Muslim, Christian, and Jew. I really was hoping for more out of this book. I can really understand how they found so much in common with their three faiths, but they never really took a look at what separates the three religions. They didn't seem to tackle the tough questions nor did they disagree on, well, anything. It turned into one big ecumenical discussion. Rating: 5 out of 10 for being just a glimmer of what it could have been had they actually discussed some serious distinctions between their three religions, instead of just focusing on the easy make-you-feel-good things their three faiths share.

Full Speed by Janet Evanovich: Well that's no fun. Apparently I don't get to have a little thumbnail of the book. *Harrumph* Anyway, I needed a book to read while getting my oil changed the other day, and my mom had gotten this through a book exchange so she let me have it. I've never read Evanovich before. My goodness, it was a quick read with absolutely no literary merit. And for once, I was totally okay with that. My brain needed a break. Rating: 5 out of 10 for probably killing brain cells, but it was a fun little romp nonetheless.

The Year of Living Biblically by AJ Jacobs: Jacobs tries to fully immerse himself in living the Bible as literally as possible: wearing white, stoning adulterers, praying, strapping the word of God to his forehead, etc. It was fun and very insightful. I didn't find it offensive, though some people might. The book was mostly focused on the Old Testament, with a bit of New thrown in at the end. I thought the OT stuff was very strong, but the book sort of petered off at the end, probably because he was preparing for the birth of his twins and the book sort of took a place on the backburner. Rating: 7 out of 10 for being fascinating, really funny, and for making me consider WHY we behave the way we do as religious people.

Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll: Seriously, was there any way that Carroll was not on drugs when he wrote this? Supremely weird. Rating: 6 out of 10 for being just crazy.

unChristian by David Kinneman: This might have been one of my favorite books of the year. It basically reveals the results of three years of research that delved into what non-Christians think about Christians. Basically, we're seen as hypocritical, conversion-focused, antihomosexual, sheltered, too political, and judgemental. Yep. Sounds about right. Sad, isn't it? The book gives hope that Christians can turn this identity around because it's killing the church and not one of those things was preached by Jesus. Focus on relationships and service instead of building membership and cutting ourselves off from the world. The book also had short comments from other authors and I liked this one in particular:

"[In thirty years] I would hope people would look at us and say, "Those Christians are the ones who run in when everyone else is running out. Those Christians are the ones who didn't give up on the crumbling inner cities. Those Christians are the ones who brought peace to Darfur. Those Christians are the ones who put an end to human trafficking. Those Christians are the ones who helped win the war on AIDS around the world. Those Christians are the ones who write those incredible lyrics, pen those unforgettable books, and create artwork that's mesmerizing. Those Christians are the ones who helped my mother when she got Alzheimer's. Those Christians are the ones who were kind to me when I was new to the area. Those Christians are the ones who made me want to believe in God." — Margaret Feinberg.

Rating: 10 out of 10. Fascinating.

* * *

In other news, check out my new blog devoted to my 2009 reading challenge. I'll update in both places, but the other blog will be solely devoted to the challenge and will have more information that this blog. 

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

October 31, 2008

The Shack by William Young

So I finally got around to reading That Really Really Popular Christian Book of the Year, William Young's the Shack. I know people who have absolutely loved it, saying it changed the way they viewed God and the Trinity and heaven and forgiveness. And I know people who have absolutely loathed it, saying it was full of blasphemy and false doctrines. I guess I fell somewhere in the middle.

From the publisher's website: Mackenzie Allen Philips’ youngest daughter, Missy, has been abducted during a family vacation and evidence that she may have been brutally murdered is found in an abandoned shack deep in the Oregon wilderness. Four years later in the midst of his Great Sadness, Mack receives a suspicious note, ostensibly from God, inviting him back to that shack for a weekend. Against his better judgment he arrives at the shack on a wintry afternoon and walks back into his darkest nightmare.  

Since I'd heard so many positive and negative reviews, I took my reading with a grain of salt. I figured I'd come across things I didn't agree with, but I also wanted to see if I could look at another side of God's character. And I found both. I liked the parts about being in community with Creation and how the rocks and trees and animals cry out that there is a Maker. The way he described relationships using colors was particularly moving. I also liked how Young presented the community of the Trinity as well. The best part of the book was about God and relationships. It really encourages readers to think less legalistically and more relationally, and I think that's it's a message most Christians desparately need to hear. 

As a side note, my favorite line from the whole book comes when Mack asks God about why He is portrayed as a father in the Bible when He actually transcends gender. God's response is: "Well," responded Papa, turning away from him and bustling around the kitchen, "there are many reasons for that, and some of them go very deep. Let me say for now that we knew once the Creation was broken, true fathering would be much more lacking than mothering. Don't misunderstand me, both are needed — but an emphasis on fathering is necessary because of the enormity of its absense." I see the lack of fathering (not in my own life! My dad rocks.) throughout this world and it makes me so very sad.

On the other hand, I didn't agree with some of the ways he portrayed God. Every once in a while God would say things like, "I don't understand why people…" etc. Um, He's God. I'm fairly certian he gets it all. Also, the interaction between God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit got a little weird for my taste. I also didn't think it was particularly well-written (a heavy overdose of adverbs and adjectives!). This is something that always detracts from stories for me, so I tried hard not to think about it. But sometimes it really drove me crazy. I know it was originally self-published, but I think a line editor could have improved the writing by leaps and bounds.

One more thing. Pretty much everyone I've talked to who has read the book is sure it's a true story; that Mack is a real guy and he really had a vision of/visitation with God. The author, however, says it's fiction. Not that there aren't truths in the book, but you can't hunt down Mack and ask him about his story. Just thought I'd clear that up.

My Rating: 6 out of 10 for offering some beautiful insights. I wish the writing hadn't detracted from those moments for me.  

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

September 30, 2008

Just call me Reader McBookerson

I'm still behind on my book blogging. So here are some Really Short Reviews so I can finally catch up!

Remember Me? by Sophie Kinsella (audio book). Pondy will attest that I had a very similar idea for a book over a year ago, and I'm convinced Kinsella stole it. Get out of my brain, Kinsella! Anyway, it was exactly what I thought it would be – meh. I've never been a huge fan of Kinsella (I think her heroines are whiny), so I wasn't expecting much. I wanted to read the story I was going to write (I would have written it better, at least that's what I liked to think). Anyway, it was an okay for a time when my brain wouldn't handle anything deeper than surface-level women's lit.

My Rating: 5 out of 10. Meh.

How Elizabeth Barrett Browning Saved My Life by Mameve Medwed. I got this book for Christmas from my friend, but since she sent it to my other friend and sent my other friend's gift to me, I didn't actually get it until this summer when the other friend and I saw each other and swapped. I really enjoyed this book. I thought it went slightly deeper than most (it's women's lit, like Kinsella's book), and it was funny and you actually felt for the main character. The characters were pretty real, and it didn't feel too contrived. And I really love the cover.  

My Rating: 8 out of 10 for being deeper than a lot of the other books in this genre. I especially liked the interaction between the main character and her best friend.
 

The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain (DailyLit.com book). This was on my list of Books Cori Should Have Read In School But Never Did. I liked it a lot at first. I liked the little scrapes Tom was getting into, and I liked how the culture of the kids was so interesting. After a while I got bored. Then it got better and I stopped being bored. I liked Huck Finn quite a bit, so I might pick up the book devoted to him next.  

My Rating: 7 out of 10, for being able to see why Mark Twain is a celebrated writer. Quite clever.

Alphabet Weekends: Love on the Road from A to Z by Elizabeth Noble. I picked up this book on the recommendation of…someone. I think it was someone on Vox. If it was you, then thank you. This was another women's lit book that I enjoyed quite a bit. The premise was very cute and leant itself well to the story. I liked the characters, and thought that they behaved in mostly realistic ways (aside from whiny heroines, that's usually my biggest complaint in this genre). 

My Rating: 8 out of 10 for being another light read that left me refreshed instead of frustrated.

Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency by Douglas Adams. Anyone who has ever read any of the Hitchhiker's Guide books knows about Douglas Adams. The man is a genius. His books are hilarious and the plots are outlandish and the characters are one-of-a-kind. It takes a certain kind of humor to appreciate his books, but if you get it, there is nothing else that compares. Dirk Gently's is on par with or may even be better than the Hitchhiker's series, depending on what you like.

My Rating: 10 out of 10. Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. 

The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins. Apparently this is a hidden gem for fans of Austen and Dickens and the like. I absolutely loved it. It's billed as one of the first mystery novels, and is full of Victorian sensationalism. The good guys are very good and the bad guys are really bad. There's heroism, villany, consequences, true love, and a lot of action. Plus it's well-written and well-paced. I had a hard time putting it down.

My Rating - 9 out of 10, for being just what I love in a classic novel.

The Uncommon Reader by Alan Bennet. This was a delightful little book. I read it in one evening and just gobbled it up. It's especially fun for anglophiles or bibliophiles, of which I am both! Basically the Queen of England discovers her love of reading late in life and all sorts of consequences ensue when she starts forgoing her duties so she can indulge her new love. Sweet and witty. Loved it. Going to buy myself a copy so I can read it when I feel sad.  

My Rating: 9 out of 10 for being original and delightfully amusing.


Breakfast at Tiffany's by Truman Capote. I'm not sure what I was expecting. Wait, that's a lie. I was expecting the movie. But the book had significantly less plot. Once I got over that and looked at it as a character study, I enjoyed it a lot more. I liked Capote's capacity for describing things in wonderful, very real ways. He has a knack for getting just the right words. Makes me want to read In Cold Blood (yes, I realize it's very different).

 

My Rating: 6 out of 10 because I liked the descriptions more than the actual book itself.

 

*and breathe* That's 47 books this year, so far.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 784 other followers